V2 Heat B: Revised Diagram Field Guide
Four AI models revised their first-pass diagrams after critique, constraint, and more context. V2 is not first instinct — V2 is adaptation. Review each one, then vote.
Poll question: After revision, which diagram shows the clearest improvement in communicating the ROY argument?
The poll runs on LinkedIn. Follow OverKill Hill P³™ on LinkedIn to participate when each heat goes live.
ChatGPT V2 Pro
Art of the possible — feature-rich and theatrical. Pushes Mermaid further. Diagram or poster?
Claude V2
Thinks beautifully. Earns the elegance through honest recursion rather than decorating it on top.
This post's own process = the example" } O{{"Happy path? Does it show real ideation?"}} P["Rebuild Add forks · loops · dead ends · honest wrong turns"] end subgraph SHIP["🚀 Ship — Send It and Learn"] direction TB Q[["Publish Post + diagram image + code screenshot + raw Mermaid in comments"]] R{{"Did the visual land faster than words alone?"}} S(["✅ Thesis Confirmed The picture earned its words"]) T["Iterate Refine diagram · reframe post"] end subgraph BRAND["🧰 OverKill Hill P³™ · Precision · Protocol · Promptcraft"] direction LR U[["AskJamie™ Friendly AI Helpdesk"]] V[["Glee-fully Personalizable Tools™ 🌳 glee-fully.tools"]] W[["OverKill Hill P³™ linkedin.com/company/overkillhillp3"]] end A --> B B --> C C --> D D -- holds up --> F F --> G G -- earned --> I I --> J J --> K K --> L L -- lands --> N N --> O O -- yes — ship it --> Q Q --> R R -- high multiplier --> S S --> U & V & W E -. sharpen .-> C G -- too cute --> H H -. reframe .-> F L -- too stiff --> M M -. rewrite .-> K O -- too linear --> P P -. rebuild .-> N R -- missed --> T T -. loop back .-> K N@{ shape: stadium} A:::spark B:::think C:::formula D:::gate E:::revise F:::insight G:::gate H:::revise I:::core J:::core K:::core L:::gate M:::revise N:::insight O:::gate P:::revise Q:::publish R:::gate S:::win T:::revise U:::brand V:::brand W:::brand classDef spark fill:#FFF4CC,stroke:#D6A700,color:#4A3B00,stroke-width:2.5px,font-weight:bold classDef think fill:#EAF2FF,stroke:#325DCC,color:#102A43,stroke-width:1.5px classDef formula fill:#F0F4FF,stroke:#4A5CCC,color:#1a2060,stroke-width:1.5px,font-style:italic classDef gate fill:#F3E8FF,stroke:#7C3AED,color:#3B0764,stroke-width:2px classDef revise fill:#FFF1F2,stroke:#DC2626,color:#7F1D1D,stroke-width:1.8px classDef insight fill:#ECFDF5,stroke:#059669,color:#064E3B,stroke-width:2px,font-weight:bold classDef core fill:#EAF2FF,stroke:#325DCC,color:#102A43,stroke-width:1.5px classDef publish fill:#EDE7F6,stroke:#5E35B1,color:#311B92,stroke-width:2.2px,font-weight:bold classDef win fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#059669,color:#064E3B,stroke-width:2.5px,font-weight:bold classDef brand fill:#F8FAFC,stroke:#4B5563,color:#111827,stroke-width:1.5px style IGNITION fill:#FFFBF0,stroke:#D6A700,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#4A3B00 style STRATEGY fill:#F5F3FF,stroke:#7C3AED,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3B0764 style CRAFT fill:#EFF6FF,stroke:#325DCC,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#1E3A5F style PROOF fill:#F0FDF4,stroke:#059669,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#064E3B style SHIP fill:#F5F3FF,stroke:#5E35B1,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#311B92 style BRAND fill:#F1F5F9,stroke:#64748B,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#334155
Perplexity V2
Can pragmatism also become beautiful? Visually memorable, clarity under complexity.
A picture is worth 1,000 words?"] B["Notice reality:
text-only creates polite confusion"] C["Draft core claim:
Not all pictures earn their words"] D["Define ROY:
Return on Your Words
(clarity gained ÷ effort spent)"] end subgraph L2["Visual 🖼️ — Modeling the Mess"] direction TB E["Pick medium:
LinkedIn post + Mermaid diagram"] F["Ask LLM for Mermaid V1
(ugly, honest, first swing)"] G{{"Does this diagram
reflect real chaos?"}} H["Too linear / fake-happy-path
→ add forks, loops, dead ends"] I["Too noisy / decorative
→ kill clutter ✂️ keep signal"] J["Tune structure & labels
so 5 seconds ≈ main idea"] K["Apply light styling
classes · colors · emoji signposts"] end subgraph L3["System 🌲 — Ship, Learn, Leverage"] direction TB L["Align prose to diagram:
Hook → thesis → proof → CTA"] M{{"ROY check:
Is this visual worth its words?"}} N["✅ High ROY:
Diagram saves meetings & rework"] O["Render final diagram image
+ code snippet screenshot"] P["Post to LinkedIn:
text + images + Mermaid link"] Q["Read comments as
confusion signals & new angles"] R["Fold insights into
next diagram + next post"] end A --> B B --> C C --> D D -- High ROY potential 💹 --> E D -- Low ROY 😬 --> C E --> F F --> G G -- Too neat --> H H --> F G -- Too messy --> I I --> F G -- Honest enough --> J J --> K K --> L L --> M M -- Yes, earns its space --> N N --> O O --> P P --> Q Q --> R R --> F M -- Not yet --> J A:::spark A:::spark B:::think B:::think C:::think C:::think D:::gate D:::gate E:::draft E:::draft F:::draft F:::draft G:::revise G:::revise H:::risk H:::risk I:::risk I:::risk J:::revise J:::revise K:::revise K:::revise L:::draft L:::draft M:::gate M:::gate N:::publish N:::publish O:::publish O:::publish P:::publish P:::publish Q:::risk Q:::risk R:::revise R:::revise classDef spark fill:#fff4cc,stroke:#d6a700,color:#4a3b00,stroke-width:2px classDef think fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,color:#0b2a4a,stroke-width:1.5px classDef draft fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#2e7d32,color:#1b5e20,stroke-width:1.5px classDef revise fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ef6c00,color:#e65100,stroke-width:1.5px classDef risk fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c53030,color:#7b1111,stroke-width:1.5px classDef gate fill:#efe9ff,stroke:#6b46c1,color:#2a124d,stroke-width:1.8px classDef publish fill:#ede7f6,stroke:#5e35b1,color:#311b92,stroke-width:2px linkStyle 3 stroke:#6b46c1,stroke-width:2px,fill:none linkStyle 4 stroke:#c53030,stroke-width:1.5px,stroke-dasharray:5 4,fill:none linkStyle 6 stroke:#c53030,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:6 4,fill:none linkStyle 7 stroke:#c53030,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:6 4,fill:none linkStyle 8 stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px,fill:none linkStyle 11 stroke:#2f855a,stroke-width:2.4px,fill:none linkStyle 12 stroke:#5e35b1,stroke-width:2.2px,fill:none linkStyle 15 stroke:#ef6c00,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:4 3,fill:none
Replit V2
Sharper code sense, same honest question. Render-tested builder’s restraint.
Generated with Mermaid"]:::logo C{"Honest? Not a happy path"}:::gate D["Add the non-happy path: loops, forks, dead ends"]:::revise E{"ROY gate: did the words earn the visual?"}:::gate F["Rebuild in prose or cut entirely"]:::revise end subgraph COUNCIL["🏛️ Council — disagreement as method"] G["6 models. Same brief. No peeking."]:::think H{"Does conflict reveal structure?"}:::gate I(["Adjudicate, synthesize, extract load-bearing lines only"]):::think end subgraph SHIP["🚀 Ship"] J[["Post + Article v0.1 — Theatrical Cut"]]:::ship K(["Comments = confusion telemetry"]):::telemetry L[["Article v1.0 — Snyder Cut"]]:::ship end subgraph REPLIT["🔧 Replit — past the page"] M{"Is the insight runnable?"}:::gate REP["
Built and deployed on Replit"]:::live N[["Live article — overkillhill.com — click to read"]]:::live O[["Fork this. Build your own council."]]:::live end Z["

OverKill Hill P3 — Precision · Protocol · Promptcraft
The words were the investment. The diagram is the return. The page is the proof.
☕ Support the forge on Ko-fi"]:::brand A --> B --> MERM --> C C -. "still lying" .-> D --> C C --> E E -. "poor ROY" .-> F --> B E --> G --> H H -. "just noise" .-> G H --> I --> J J --> K K -. "patch v2" .-> L J --> M M -. "stays prose" .-> L M --> REP --> N --> O L & O --> Z click MERM "https://mermaidchart.cello.so/UhVlNtC2MlS" "Try Mermaid — referral link" click REP "https://replit.com/refer/overkillhillp3" "Build on Replit — referral link" click O "https://replit.com/refer/overkillhillp3" "Fork this on Replit — referral link" click A "https://overkillhill.com/writings/first-diagram-is-a-liar/" "Read the full article" click J "https://www.linkedin.com/company/overkillhillp3" "LinkedIn Post" click L "https://overkillhill.com/writings/first-diagram-is-a-liar/" "Article v1.0" click N "https://overkillhill.com/writings/first-diagram-is-a-liar/" "Open the live page" click Z "https://ko-fi.com/T6T71HCY6A" "Support the forge on Ko-fi"
← Back to the full article: The First Diagram Is Usually a Liar — V2 Diagrams →
Download the deck: Etch-AI-Sketch deck (square + wide) →
Want to explore Mermaid diagrams yourself?
The diagrams above were built with Mermaid.js and rendered live on this page. To explore the syntax or build your own, Mermaid Chart is the place to start. That is a separate referral path from the diagram links above.