v0.3 — Visual Edition | V2 Heat B | Field Guide

V2 Heat B: Revised Diagram Field Guide

Four AI models revised their first-pass diagrams after critique, constraint, and more context. V2 is not first instinct — V2 is adaptation. Review each one, then vote.

Poll question: After revision, which diagram shows the clearest improvement in communicating the ROY argument?

The poll runs on LinkedIn. Follow OverKill Hill P³™ on LinkedIn to participate when each heat goes live.

ChatGPT V2 Pro

Art of the possible — feature-rich and theatrical. Pushes Mermaid further. Diagram or poster?

--- config: theme: neutral look: neo htmlLabels: true fontFamily: Aptos, Segoe UI, Inter, Arial, sans-serif flowchart: curve: basis defaultRenderer: elk themeVariables: primaryColor: '#EAF3FF' primaryTextColor: '#142033' primaryBorderColor: '#3E6EA8' lineColor: '#627184' secondaryColor: '#F6F0FF' tertiaryColor: '#EEF9F0' background: '#FFFFFF' clusterBkg: '#FAFBFC' clusterBorder: '#CBD5E1' edgeLabelBackground: '#FFFFFF' fontFamily: Aptos, Segoe UI, Inter, Arial, sans-serif layout: elk --- flowchart LR subgraph S1["**1. Friction** · _words hit their limit_"] direction TB A["Spark 💥"] B["Most documentation is **polite confusion**."] C["Words carry nuance.\nVisuals carry **shape**."] D["ROY > 1?"] X["Decorative wallpaper"] end subgraph S2["**2. Modeling** · _turn prose into structure_"] direction TB E["Angles + notes"] F["Draft post"] G["Mermaid V1"] H["Honest?"] I["Add forks + loops"] J["Kill clutter ✂️"] K["Now it earns trust"] end subgraph S3["**3. Proof + publish** · _show the work, then ship it_"] direction TB L["Write around the proof:\n**hook → thesis → diagram → CTA**"] M["Diagram + code images"] N["Clear in 5 seconds?"] O(("Ship 🚀")) P["OverKill Hill P³™"] Q["Comments → V2"] end A --> B B --> C C --> D D -- No --> X D -- Yes --> E E --> F F --> G G --> H H -- Too tidy --> I H -- Too noisy --> J H -- Credible --> K I -.-> G J -.-> G K --> L L --> M M --> N N -. No .-> J N -- Yes --> O O --> P O -.-> Q Q -.-> F A@{ shape: bolt} D@{ shape: diam} X@{ shape: rect} E@{ shape: docs} F@{ shape: doc} G@{ shape: fr-rect} H@{ shape: diam} I@{ shape: fork} J@{ shape: notch-rect} K@{ shape: hex} M@{ shape: docs} N@{ shape: diam} P@{ shape: tag-rect} Q@{ shape: hourglass} A:::spark B:::core C:::core D:::gate X:::risk E:::draft F:::draft G:::draft H:::gate I:::risk J:::risk K:::win L:::core M:::publish N:::gate O:::publish P:::brand Q:::feedback classDef spark fill:#FFF4CC,stroke:#D6A700,color:#4A3B00,stroke-width:2.5px,font-weight:bold classDef core fill:#EAF3FF,stroke:#3E6EA8,color:#142033,stroke-width:1.6px classDef gate fill:#F6F0FF,stroke:#7E57C2,color:#221533,stroke-width:2px,font-weight:bold classDef draft fill:#F3F4F6,stroke:#64748B,color:#334155,stroke-width:1.4px classDef risk fill:#FFF1F2,stroke:#C05666,color:#5A1822,stroke-width:1.8px classDef win fill:#EEF9F0,stroke:#3E8E5A,color:#12331D,stroke-width:2px,font-weight:bold classDef publish fill:#ECFDF5,stroke:#059669,color:#064E3B,stroke-width:2.2px,font-weight:bold classDef brand fill:#111827,stroke:#374151,color:#FFFFFF,stroke-width:2.4px,font-weight:bold classDef feedback fill:#FFF7ED,stroke:#DD6B20,color:#5B3415,stroke-width:1.7px style S1 fill:#F8FBFF,stroke:#A8C1DD,stroke-width:1.3px style S2 fill:#FFFCF7,stroke:#D9C7A5,stroke-width:1.3px style S3 fill:#F9FAFB,stroke:#C9D2DE,stroke-width:1.3px

Claude V2

Thinks beautifully. Earns the elegance through honest recursion rather than decorating it on top.

--- config: theme: neutral fontFamily: Segoe UI, Inter, Arial, sans-serif themeVariables: primaryColor: '#EAF2FF' primaryTextColor: '#14213D' primaryBorderColor: '#325DCC' lineColor: '#64748B' secondaryColor: '#FFF7E8' tertiaryColor: '#EEFDF3' edgeLabelBackground: '#FFFFFF' clusterBkg: '#F8FAFC' clusterBorder: '#CBD5E0' fontFamily: Segoe UI, Inter, Arial, sans-serif look: neo layout: dagre --- flowchart TB subgraph IGNITION["⚡ Ignition — The Idea Finds You"] direction TB A(["💥 Spark 30 min of prose · nobody read it 30 sec of diagram · everyone got it"]) B[/"Hypothesis Not all pictures earn their words"/] C[["ROY Formula Clarity × Universality ÷ Words to generate"]] end subgraph STRATEGY["🧭 Strategy — Shape the Argument"] direction TB D{{"Does the framing hold?"}} E["Sharpen it Refine the ratio metaphor"] F(["✨ The Recursive Twist Diagram the post · inside the post"]) G{{"Too clever? Will readers get it or roll their eyes?"}} H["Dial it back Lead with utility · not wit"] end subgraph CRAFT["✏️ Craft — Build the Thing"] direction TB I[["Medium LinkedIn · 3K char · images in post · code in comments"]] J[["Tool Mermaid — LLM-native · free · no design degree"]] K["Draft Hook → Thesis → Diagram → Proof → CTA"] L{{"Hook landing?"}} M["Kill the clever Find the honest"] end subgraph PROOF["📐 Proof — The Diagram Earns Its Space"] direction TB N@{ label: "✏️ Embed It
This post's own process = the example" } O{{"Happy path? Does it show real ideation?"}} P["Rebuild Add forks · loops · dead ends · honest wrong turns"] end subgraph SHIP["🚀 Ship — Send It and Learn"] direction TB Q[["Publish Post + diagram image + code screenshot + raw Mermaid in comments"]] R{{"Did the visual land faster than words alone?"}} S(["✅ Thesis Confirmed The picture earned its words"]) T["Iterate Refine diagram · reframe post"] end subgraph BRAND["🧰 OverKill Hill P³™ · Precision · Protocol · Promptcraft"] direction LR U[["AskJamie™ Friendly AI Helpdesk"]] V[["Glee-fully Personalizable Tools™ 🌳 glee-fully.tools"]] W[["OverKill Hill P³™ linkedin.com/company/overkillhillp3"]] end A --> B B --> C C --> D D -- holds up --> F F --> G G -- earned --> I I --> J J --> K K --> L L -- lands --> N N --> O O -- yes — ship it --> Q Q --> R R -- high multiplier --> S S --> U & V & W E -. sharpen .-> C G -- too cute --> H H -. reframe .-> F L -- too stiff --> M M -. rewrite .-> K O -- too linear --> P P -. rebuild .-> N R -- missed --> T T -. loop back .-> K N@{ shape: stadium} A:::spark B:::think C:::formula D:::gate E:::revise F:::insight G:::gate H:::revise I:::core J:::core K:::core L:::gate M:::revise N:::insight O:::gate P:::revise Q:::publish R:::gate S:::win T:::revise U:::brand V:::brand W:::brand classDef spark fill:#FFF4CC,stroke:#D6A700,color:#4A3B00,stroke-width:2.5px,font-weight:bold classDef think fill:#EAF2FF,stroke:#325DCC,color:#102A43,stroke-width:1.5px classDef formula fill:#F0F4FF,stroke:#4A5CCC,color:#1a2060,stroke-width:1.5px,font-style:italic classDef gate fill:#F3E8FF,stroke:#7C3AED,color:#3B0764,stroke-width:2px classDef revise fill:#FFF1F2,stroke:#DC2626,color:#7F1D1D,stroke-width:1.8px classDef insight fill:#ECFDF5,stroke:#059669,color:#064E3B,stroke-width:2px,font-weight:bold classDef core fill:#EAF2FF,stroke:#325DCC,color:#102A43,stroke-width:1.5px classDef publish fill:#EDE7F6,stroke:#5E35B1,color:#311B92,stroke-width:2.2px,font-weight:bold classDef win fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#059669,color:#064E3B,stroke-width:2.5px,font-weight:bold classDef brand fill:#F8FAFC,stroke:#4B5563,color:#111827,stroke-width:1.5px style IGNITION fill:#FFFBF0,stroke:#D6A700,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#4A3B00 style STRATEGY fill:#F5F3FF,stroke:#7C3AED,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3B0764 style CRAFT fill:#EFF6FF,stroke:#325DCC,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#1E3A5F style PROOF fill:#F0FDF4,stroke:#059669,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#064E3B style SHIP fill:#F5F3FF,stroke:#5E35B1,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#311B92 style BRAND fill:#F1F5F9,stroke:#64748B,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#334155

Perplexity V2

Can pragmatism also become beautiful? Visually memorable, clarity under complexity.

--- config: theme: neutral look: neo --- flowchart LR subgraph L1["Prose 📝 — Setup & Claim"] direction TB A["💥 Spark
A picture is worth 1,000 words?"] B["Notice reality:
text-only creates polite confusion"] C["Draft core claim:
Not all pictures earn their words"] D["Define ROY:
Return on Your Words
(clarity gained ÷ effort spent)"] end subgraph L2["Visual 🖼️ — Modeling the Mess"] direction TB E["Pick medium:
LinkedIn post + Mermaid diagram"] F["Ask LLM for Mermaid V1
(ugly, honest, first swing)"] G{{"Does this diagram
reflect real chaos?"}} H["Too linear / fake-happy-path
→ add forks, loops, dead ends"] I["Too noisy / decorative
→ kill clutter ✂️ keep signal"] J["Tune structure & labels
so 5 seconds ≈ main idea"] K["Apply light styling
classes · colors · emoji signposts"] end subgraph L3["System 🌲 — Ship, Learn, Leverage"] direction TB L["Align prose to diagram:
Hook → thesis → proof → CTA"] M{{"ROY check:
Is this visual worth its words?"}} N["✅ High ROY:
Diagram saves meetings & rework"] O["Render final diagram image
+ code snippet screenshot"] P["Post to LinkedIn:
text + images + Mermaid link"] Q["Read comments as
confusion signals & new angles"] R["Fold insights into
next diagram + next post"] end A --> B B --> C C --> D D -- High ROY potential 💹 --> E D -- Low ROY 😬 --> C E --> F F --> G G -- Too neat --> H H --> F G -- Too messy --> I I --> F G -- Honest enough --> J J --> K K --> L L --> M M -- Yes, earns its space --> N N --> O O --> P P --> Q Q --> R R --> F M -- Not yet --> J A:::spark A:::spark B:::think B:::think C:::think C:::think D:::gate D:::gate E:::draft E:::draft F:::draft F:::draft G:::revise G:::revise H:::risk H:::risk I:::risk I:::risk J:::revise J:::revise K:::revise K:::revise L:::draft L:::draft M:::gate M:::gate N:::publish N:::publish O:::publish O:::publish P:::publish P:::publish Q:::risk Q:::risk R:::revise R:::revise classDef spark fill:#fff4cc,stroke:#d6a700,color:#4a3b00,stroke-width:2px classDef think fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1565c0,color:#0b2a4a,stroke-width:1.5px classDef draft fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#2e7d32,color:#1b5e20,stroke-width:1.5px classDef revise fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#ef6c00,color:#e65100,stroke-width:1.5px classDef risk fill:#ffebee,stroke:#c53030,color:#7b1111,stroke-width:1.5px classDef gate fill:#efe9ff,stroke:#6b46c1,color:#2a124d,stroke-width:1.8px classDef publish fill:#ede7f6,stroke:#5e35b1,color:#311b92,stroke-width:2px linkStyle 3 stroke:#6b46c1,stroke-width:2px,fill:none linkStyle 4 stroke:#c53030,stroke-width:1.5px,stroke-dasharray:5 4,fill:none linkStyle 6 stroke:#c53030,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:6 4,fill:none linkStyle 7 stroke:#c53030,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:6 4,fill:none linkStyle 8 stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:2px,fill:none linkStyle 11 stroke:#2f855a,stroke-width:2.4px,fill:none linkStyle 12 stroke:#5e35b1,stroke-width:2.2px,fill:none linkStyle 15 stroke:#ef6c00,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray:4 3,fill:none

Replit V2

Sharper code sense, same honest question. Render-tested builder’s restraint.

%%{init:{"theme":"base","themeVariables":{"primaryColor":"#111827","primaryTextColor":"#e5e7eb","primaryBorderColor":"#c46a2c","lineColor":"#c46a2c","secondaryColor":"#181f26","tertiaryColor":"#1c3a34","fontFamily":"DM Sans, system-ui, sans-serif","fontSize":"14px","edgeLabelBackground":"#111827","clusterBkg":"#0a1628","clusterBorder":"#c46a2c"}}}%% flowchart TD classDef spark fill:#c46a2c,stroke:#e6a03c,color:#0f172a,font-weight:bold classDef think fill:#1c3a34,stroke:#c46a2c,color:#e5e7eb classDef gate fill:#5b3a27,stroke:#e6a03c,color:#e5e7eb classDef revise fill:#676a2c,stroke:#e6a03c,color:#e5e7eb classDef ship fill:#111827,stroke:#c46a2c,color:#e5e7eb classDef live fill:#0a1628,stroke:#e6a03c,color:#e6a03c,font-weight:bold classDef telemetry fill:#2a2320,stroke:#676a2c,color:#6b7280 classDef brand fill:#a06e28,stroke:#e6a03c,color:#0f172a,font-weight:bold classDef logo fill:#111827,stroke:#c46a2c,color:#e5e7eb subgraph IGNITION["⚡ Ignition"] A(["💡 Spark: ROY insight"]):::spark B["Claim: a picture earns more than the words that generated it"]:::think end subgraph CRAFT["✏️ Craft — the first diagram lies"] MERM["
Generated with Mermaid"]:::logo C{"Honest? Not a happy path"}:::gate D["Add the non-happy path: loops, forks, dead ends"]:::revise E{"ROY gate: did the words earn the visual?"}:::gate F["Rebuild in prose or cut entirely"]:::revise end subgraph COUNCIL["🏛️ Council — disagreement as method"] G["6 models. Same brief. No peeking."]:::think H{"Does conflict reveal structure?"}:::gate I(["Adjudicate, synthesize, extract load-bearing lines only"]):::think end subgraph SHIP["🚀 Ship"] J[["Post + Article v0.1 — Theatrical Cut"]]:::ship K(["Comments = confusion telemetry"]):::telemetry L[["Article v1.0 — Snyder Cut"]]:::ship end subgraph REPLIT["🔧 Replit — past the page"] M{"Is the insight runnable?"}:::gate REP["
Built and deployed on Replit"]:::live N[["Live article — overkillhill.com — click to read"]]:::live O[["Fork this. Build your own council."]]:::live end Z["
OverKill Hill P3 — Precision · Protocol · Promptcraft
The words were the investment. The diagram is the return. The page is the proof.
☕ Support the forge on Ko-fi"]:::brand A --> B --> MERM --> C C -. "still lying" .-> D --> C C --> E E -. "poor ROY" .-> F --> B E --> G --> H H -. "just noise" .-> G H --> I --> J J --> K K -. "patch v2" .-> L J --> M M -. "stays prose" .-> L M --> REP --> N --> O L & O --> Z click MERM "https://mermaidchart.cello.so/UhVlNtC2MlS" "Try Mermaid — referral link" click REP "https://replit.com/refer/overkillhillp3" "Build on Replit — referral link" click O "https://replit.com/refer/overkillhillp3" "Fork this on Replit — referral link" click A "https://overkillhill.com/writings/first-diagram-is-a-liar/" "Read the full article" click J "https://www.linkedin.com/company/overkillhillp3" "LinkedIn Post" click L "https://overkillhill.com/writings/first-diagram-is-a-liar/" "Article v1.0" click N "https://overkillhill.com/writings/first-diagram-is-a-liar/" "Open the live page" click Z "https://ko-fi.com/T6T71HCY6A" "Support the forge on Ko-fi"

Want to explore Mermaid diagrams yourself?

The diagrams above were built with Mermaid.js and rendered live on this page. To explore the syntax or build your own, Mermaid Chart is the place to start. That is a separate referral path from the diagram links above.